A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, wherever sights of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire Visible evidence in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Males entered the water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the location grew to become One of the more placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed based on Experienced tips and authorized designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the René Collier and Paul Feely site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.